Report From Council

At the 231st Meeting of the ACS, I represented the Dayton Section for the third time at Council. Shortly after 7 AM on Wednesday, March 29, councilors were herded into a room for a continental breakfast, although there were no tables, much less chairs, for councilors to place their beverages on while they ate with plate in hand. Several councilors commandeered for their personal use the small table holding the half-and-half, contributing to the testiness of other councilors before their first cup of the day. Perhaps at next Council, we’ll be provided bibs and troughs so that we can all dine hands free.

Elections
I am happy to report that I am 2-for-2 in selecting presidential candidates; the majority once again agreed with my selections for candidates for President-Elect, 2007: Bruce E. Bursten and Bassam Z. Shakhashiri (the losers, make that non-winners, were Richard Eisenberg and Matthew V. Tirrell). Before I became Councilor, I voted for ACS President by counting the number of times, if any, that the candidate mentioned unemployment issues or whether or not a candidate was from New York. Now, however, I read carefully the nominees’ written statements, note their past service to ACS, and grade each nominee on their answers at the Town Hall Meeting. Finally, there are the nominees’ oral statements at Council just before the vote is called for. Matthew V. Tirrell flubbed his answer to a question on open access journals and his past service to ACS was scant. By my count, Shakhashiri came out slightly ahead of Eisenberg at the Town Hall Meeting but Shakhashiri’s speaking style struck me as harsh. However, Shakhashiri won me over at Council, where he was animated, humorous, and came across as strictly pro-member. Rumor has it, though, that not one but two petition candidates for ACS President may be in the offing. I hope that they will be invited to address Council in San Francisco if, indeed, they meet petition requirements. Candidates will stand for election in the Fall National Election.

The Committee on Nominations and Elections announced the selection of the following candidates for Directors-at-Large for a 2007-2009 term: William H. (Jack) Breazeale, Jr., Dennis Chamot, Peter K. Dorhout, Paul R. Jones, Valerie J. Kuck, and Dorothy J. Phillips. The election of three Directors- at-Large will be conducted in the fall. Two candidates will fill the 2007-2009 term, and one will fill a two-year vacancy for 2007-2008 created by the resignation of Director-at-Large James D. Burke (effective December 31, 2006). Ballots will be mailed to the Council on or before October 10.

Committee Review
As part of a regular review, the Council VOTED to continue the Committee on Admissions and the Committee on Professional Training. The Committee on Admissions has the power to interpret and apply the requirements for membership, including determining status of applicants educated in foreign countries. The Committee on Professional Training promotes and assists in the development of high standards of excellence in all aspects of post-secondary chemical education, and undertakes studies important to their maintenance.

The Society’s Finances
The Society ended 2005 with a net contribution from operations of $11.6 million, which was $9.1 million favorable to the approved budget. The favorable variance was primarily attributable to higherthan- budgeted print and electronic information services revenue and investment income, as well as expense savings from staff vacancies and reductions in information technology spending. The Society also realized $21.0 million in investment gains. In total, unrestricted net assets increased just over $26 million in 2005 to $211 million, and the Society ended 2005 in full compliance with the Boardestablished financial guidelines.

Registration Report
As of March 28, 2006, the ACS spring national meeting had attracted 12,546 registrants as follows: Regular attendees 6,323; Students 4,158; Exhibitors 1,288; Exposition only 413; and Guests 364.

Society Initiatives
    ACS committees and councilor caucuses provided input into three key Society initiatives:
1. The Society’s new vision statement: “Improving people’s lives through the transforming power of chemistry,” which resulted from the input of several thousand ACS members, was unveiled and discussed at this meeting. At the District II Caucus, which I attended, a large majority of Councilors made it clear their dissatisfaction with the new vision statement. Criticisms include the fact that it is not a complete sentence, that it does not even mention the society, and that it would have been a lot cheaper to license from Dupont their old slogan, “better living through chemistry.” I, for one, am nonplussed with the new vision statement. An alternative, which, however, does not quell the above criticisms is, “Transforming people’s lives through the power of chemistry.”
2. The Board-Council Policy Committee Governance Review Task Force was charged with reviewing the Society’s governance, and Constitution and Bylaws, to ensure that the Society has a governing framework to enable it to best fulfill its mission, meet member needs, and remain a world-class organization. The task force developed a framework that emphasized five key elements of the Society’s governance, which are: membership, geographical organization, disciplinary organization, governance structure, and governance operations.
3. A Program Review Advisory Group (PRAG) has been established to assist the Committee on Budget and Finance in reviewing all programs of the Society (with some exemptions) on a periodic and regular basis. The PRAG consists of councilors, members of the Board of Directors, members of the Committee on Budget and Finance, and representatives from the committees with oversight over the programs under review in a given year.

Member Statistics
ACS closed 2005 with 158,422 members, reversing a 4-year downward trend in Society membership. Of the 15,532 applications processed in 2005, nearly 900 came from the Member-Get-AMember campaign, in which many councilors participated. The membership retention number remained stable at 92.4%.

Special Discussion
A special discussion item was put on the Council agenda for this meeting. The discussion focused on membership – specifically, the requirements for ACS membership, and whether they should be made more or less restrictive, or kept the same. ACS President E. Ann Nalley invited the co-chairs of the Board-Council Policy Committee Governance Review Task Force, James D. Burke and William F. Carroll, to help frame the discussion by presenting the results of a councilor survey on ACS membership requirements.

2006 Member Dues
The Council VOTED to set the member dues for 2007 at the fully escalated rate of $132.

Future National Meetings
The Council voted to recommend to the Board of Directors that the spring meeting for 2015 be held in Denver, Colorado, March 22-26; and that the fall meeting be held in Boston, Massachusetts, August 16-20. The Council also voted to recommend locations and dates for the 2016 meeting as follows: the spring meeting to be held on March 13-17, in San Diego, California; and the fall meeting to be held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on August 21-25.
 

Your faithful Councilor, Steve Trohalaki